Top Primatologist Explains Why 100 Men vs 1 Gorilla Fight Wouldn’t Happen

A prime primatologist is making an attempt to convey some purpose into the hundred males vs one gorilla debate … explaining the primary purpose why a struggle like this would not go down — and arguing this paints these stunning creatures in a nasty mild.

We spoke with Michael Stern — the previous Curator of Primates on the Philadelphia Zoo with years of expertise finding out gorillas each in captivity and within the wild in Uganda — and, he tells us the primary purpose this debate is so foolish is as a result of one gorilla would go searching, see it was outnumbered and take off.

Stern says that is the equal of asking if a unicorn may take down a dinosaur — or if a shark with a laser beam may blow up a submarine!

The gorilla would notice it was in a nasty spot, and certain dash via the closest line of males … knocking one or two apart whereas making an attempt to make a run for it — no struggle for the planet of the apes right here. Sorry, Chris Pontius — seems to be such as you’re flawed on this one.

Michael explains the explanation persons are so into this debate is due to the sheer velocity and power of gorillas — and, he admits they’re tremendous robust creatures … however, they’re extra mild giants than fierce troopers, and all this speak is basically damaging to their rep.

For a primate that may truly do some injury to a gaggle of males, Michael says look no additional than the chimpanzee … a number of of which have attacked people prior to now.

Michael additionally talked to us in regards to the New Nature Foundation — a corporation he is a part of that’s seeking to cease deforestation in Africa via a wide range of new applied sciences — in case folks truly need to assist primates as a substitute of arguing about their combating acumen. Take a pay attention and take a look at their web site for more information.